Evergreen monthly benchmark — Aug 4
Dog Food
Aug 4Rank Trend
How top brands moved week over week. Rank 1 is the top position.
Purina Pro Plan holds the number one slot at ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini this run and sits second at Perplexity. Hills Science Diet made the sharper move. It carried 10 mentions last run without reaching a single top three, and this run it is top three at all four engines. Royal Canin went the other way. It kept all 8 of its mentions and lost the number one slot it held at both Gemini and Perplexity.
Top Brands by AI Mention Frequency
Mention frequency counts how many times a brand appeared across all AI responses. This differs from top-pick rank, which reflects each model’s #1 choice.
Opportunity for Brands
- IAMS is the clearest gap this run.
- It added two mentions to reach 6, the fourth highest total in the category, and it landed no top three slot at any engine.
- Last run it was the ChatGPT number two, so the volume is holding but the ranking is not.
- The Farmers Dog and Orijen each went from 2 mentions to 4 and also finished outside every top three.
- Eleven brands entered the set for the first time, all at one mention except Canidae and Spot and Tango at two.
- Three left it: Taste of the Wild, American Journey and Pedigree.
Cross-Agent Comparison
How 4 AI models rank the same category. Hover a brand to trace it across models.
4 agents · top 3 each
| Agent | #1 | #2 | #3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| chatgpt | Purina Pro Plan | Purina ONE | Hills Science Diet |
| claude | Purina Pro Plan | Royal Canin | Hills Science Diet |
| gemini | Purina Pro Plan | Purina ONE | Hills Science Diet |
| perplexity | Hills Science Diet | Purina Pro Plan | Spot & Tango |
What This Means
- Three of the four engines return the same shape.
- ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini all open with Purina Pro Plan and all close their top three with Hills Science Diet.
- The middle slot is where they split.
- ChatGPT and Gemini give it to Purina ONE, which tops both of their budget answers.
- Claude gives it to Royal Canin.
- Perplexity is the outlier.
- It leads with Hills Science Diet and hands its third slot to Spot and Tango, a brand no other engine named.
- Perplexity also contradicted itself inside the run.
- Its ranking prompt demoted Hills Science Diet, Royal Canin and Purina Pro Plan to a use with caution tier on ingredient quality.
- Its other two prompts had recommended all three first.
- ChatGPT remains the only engine that returns a shoppable carousel with a fixed price per bag.
Why These Brands Win
- The winning brands share an institutional paper trail rather than an ingredient list.
- ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini name the same three credentials.
- They want a board certified veterinary nutritionist on staff, AAFCO feeding trials rather than formulation on paper, and company owned plants.
- Three of the four cite WSAVA guidelines by name.
- All four engines warned against grain free and legume heavy diets, citing the FDA investigation into dilated cardiomyopathy.
- That single caution does most of the sorting in this category.
- It holds boutique and grain free brands out of the top tiers.
- Purina Pro Plan, Hills Science Diet and Royal Canin account for 29 of the 78 brand mentions this run.
Frequently Asked Questions
What dog food does AI recommend most?▾
Which dog food brand ranks #1 across all AI models?▾
Why does ChatGPT recommend different dog food than Claude?▾
What dog food brands are invisible to AI?▾
How we measure this
Each benchmark runs the same standardized prompts across multiple leading AI systems, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. We use consistent, category-specific questions designed to surface genuine product recommendations — not sponsored results.
Responses are parsed to extract brand mentions, rank position, and frequency. We then analyze cross-model agreement, identify which brands consistently appear in top positions, and flag where AI outputs diverge from marketplace trends.
Evergreen categories are benchmarked monthly. Results reflect organic AI behavior at the time of testing. Read the full methodology
How this report was produced
- Evaluation period
- Aug 4
- Cadence
- Monthly
- Prompts evaluated
- 3
- Review status
- Published after human review
- Models included
- ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity
Full details of how prompts are run, parsed, normalized, and scored are in the methodology, and the platform page explains how the system is built and operated.
Are you a brand in this category? Request a private analysis