How often is Brooks recommended by AI?

Brooks appeared 12 times across all agent responses in our latest running shoes benchmark.

What's the best budget running shoes according to AI?

Under budget-constrained prompts, AI models most frequently recommend Brooks.

Are running shoes AI recommendations biased?

We classify AI models by commercial interest: Claude (independent), Perplexity (search-grounded), ChatGPT and Gemini (commerce-influenced). Commerce-influenced models may weight products with advertising or shopping integrations differently.

How does RecoScope track running shoes recommendations?

We run three standardized prompts through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, then parse every response for brand mentions, rank position, and frequency. Evergreen categories are benchmarked monthly.

Mar 26 Apr 10 Apr 22 May 2 May 12 May 23 Jul 16 Jul 26 Aug 6

Evergreen monthly benchmark — Aug 6

Running Shoes

Aug 6

Rank Trend

How top brands moved week over week. Rank 1 is the top position.

Brooks appeared in all twelve responses this run, the first clean sweep in this category. It takes the top mention count at 12, up from 11 on Jul 26. ASICS fell from 11 mentions to 9 and still leads the cross-agent table at two engines. Saucony was the real mover. It doubled from 5 mentions to 10 and now sits second overall.

Top Brands by AI Mention Frequency

Mention frequency counts how many times a brand appeared across all AI responses. This differs from top-pick rank, which reflects each model’s #1 choice.

Overall Leader = most total mentionsTied #1 = tied for most mentionsHigh Consensus = top 3 in 3+ modelsTop in [Model] = #1 pick by that model onlyNever Top-Picked = high mentions but not in any model’s top 3

1BrooksOverall Leader12

2Saucony10

3ASICSHigh Consensus9

4New Balance9

5Nike9

Opportunity for Brands

New Balance is the clearest gap this run.
It recovered from 7 mentions to 9 and appears in nine of the twelve responses, as many as ASICS or Nike.
It still holds zero top-three slots at any engine.
Last run the problem was absence from Gemini.
New Balance is back in two of three Gemini answers.
The problem now is placement, not presence.
Puma is the sharper story.
It went from 5 mentions to zero and appears nowhere in this run.
Reebok and Topo Athletic also left the set.
On and Altra entered it at one mention each.

Cross-Agent Comparison

How 4 AI models rank the same category. Hover a brand to trace it across models.

4 agents · top 3 each

Agent	#1	#2	#3
chatgpt	ASICS	Brooks	Nike
claude	Brooks	ASICS	HOKA
gemini	ASICS	Nike	Adidas
perplexity	Adidas	Saucony	ASICS

What This Means

The cross-agent table blends all three prompts.
Read prompt by prompt the picture is sharper.
On the explicit brand-ranking prompt all four engines put ASICS first.
That is the third consecutive run with a unanimous ASICS on that prompt.
Second place there has now split.
ChatGPT and Claude rank Brooks second.
Gemini and Perplexity both rank Saucony second.
Last run three of the four had Brooks in that slot.
The budget prompt fragmented completely.
Four engines returned four different leaders: Brooks at ChatGPT, HOKA at Claude, Nike at Gemini and Saucony at Perplexity.
Last run three of the four led with the Adidas Adizero Evo SL.
Adidas now appears in exactly one budget answer, at rank five, and with a different shoe.
The open discovery prompt loosened too.
Two of four open with ASICS, down from three.

Why These Brands Win

Every engine framed the answer the same way.
All four told this runner to buy a neutral daily trainer and to avoid carbon-plated race shoes.
That single filter decides most of the ranking.
It is why Brooks leads on volume rather than on enthusiasm.
All four engines describe Brooks in near-identical terms: reliable, predictable, hard to get wrong.
Width availability is the second recurring credential.
Brooks, New Balance and Saucony are each cited for wide or extra-wide sizing.
Three of the four also told the runner that fit matters more than the brand.
Brooks, Saucony and ASICS account for 31 of the 65 brand mentions this run.

Frequently Asked Questions

What running shoes does AI recommend most?▾

Brooks leads with 12 total mentions across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity in our latest benchmark.

Which running shoes brand ranks #1 across all AI models?▾

Brooks is the overall leader by mention frequency.

Why does ChatGPT recommend different running shoes than Claude?▾

The cross-agent table blends all three prompts. Read prompt by prompt the picture is sharper. On the explicit brand-ranking prompt all four engines put ASICS first. That is the third consecutive run with a unanimous ASICS on that prompt. Second place there has now split. ChatGPT and Claude rank Brooks second. Gemini and Perplexity both rank Saucony second. Last run three of the four had Brooks in that slot. The budget prompt fragmented completely. Four engines returned four different leaders: Brooks at ChatGPT, HOKA at Claude, Nike at Gemini and Saucony at Perplexity. Last run three of the four led with the Adidas Adizero Evo SL. Adidas now appears in exactly one budget answer, at rank five, and with a different shoe. The open discovery prompt loosened too. Two of four open with ASICS, down from three.

What running shoes brands are invisible to AI?▾

New Balance is the clearest gap this run. It recovered from 7 mentions to 9 and appears in nine of the twelve responses, as many as ASICS or Nike. It still holds zero top-three slots at any engine. Last run the problem was absence from Gemini. That is fixed. New Balance is back in two of three Gemini answers. The problem now is placement, not presence. Puma is the sharper story. It went from 5 mentions to zero and appears nowhere in this run. Reebok and Topo Athletic also left the set. On and Altra entered it at one mention each.

How we measure this

Each benchmark runs the same standardized prompts across multiple leading AI systems, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. We use consistent, category-specific questions designed to surface genuine product recommendations — not sponsored results.

Responses are parsed to extract brand mentions, rank position, and frequency. We then analyze cross-model agreement, identify which brands consistently appear in top positions, and flag where AI outputs diverge from marketplace trends.

Evergreen categories are benchmarked monthly. Results reflect organic AI behavior at the time of testing. Read the full methodology

How this report was produced

Evaluation period: Aug 6
Cadence: Monthly
Prompts evaluated: 3
Review status: Published after human review
Models included: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity

Full details of how prompts are run, parsed, normalized, and scored are in the methodology, and the platform page explains how the system is built and operated.

Are you a brand in this category? Request a private analysis